Tuesday, March 23, 2010

GIIBS Breifing yesterday (VIDEO ONE HOUR)( Important to Watch)

President on Immigration M arch(almost a half million strong) In Washington DC(VIDEO)

Remarks by the President and Vice President at Signing of the Health Insurance Reform Bill | The White House

Remarks by the President and Vice President at Signing of the Health Insurance Reform Bill | The White House
 


The White House
Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President and Vice President at Signing of the Health Insurance Reform Bill

East Room

11:29 A.M. EDT
THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you all.  (Applause.)
AUDIENCE:  Fired up!  Ready to go!  Fired up!  Ready to go!
THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.
Mr. President, I think we got a happy room here.  (Laughter.)  It seems ridiculous to say thank you all for being here.  (Laughter.)  Ladies and gentlemen, to state the obvious, this is a historic day.  (Applause.)
In our business you use that phrase a lot, but I can't think of a day in the 37 years that I've been a United States senator and the short time I've been Vice President that it is more appropriately stated.  This is a historic day.
And history -- history is not merely what is printed in textbooks.  It doesn’t begin or end with the stroke of a pen.  History is made.  History is made when men and women decide that there is a greater risk in accepting a situation that we cannot bear than in steeling our spine and embracing the promise of change.  That's when history is made.  (Applause.)
History is made when you all assembled here today, members of Congress, take charge to change the lives of tens of millions of Americans.  Through the efforts of those of us lucky enough to serve here in this town, that's exactly what you’ve done.  You’ve made history.
History is made when a leader steps up, stays true to his values, and charts a fundamentally different course for the country.  History is made when a leader’s passion -- passion -- is matched with principle to set a new course.  Well, ladies and gentlemen, Mr. President, you are that leader.  (Applause.)
Mr. President, your fierce advocacy, the clarity of purpose that you showed, your perseverance -- these are in fact -- it is not hyperbole to say -- these are the reasons why we're assembled in this room together, today.  But for those attributes we would not be here.  Many, many men and women are going to feel the pride that I feel in watching you shortly, watching you sign this bill, knowing that their work -- their work has helped make this day possible.  But, Mr. President, you’re the guy that made it happen.  (Applause.)
And so, Mr. President, all of us, press and elected officials, assembled in this town over the years, we’ve seen some incredible things happen.  But you know, Mr. President, you’ve done what generations of not just ordinary, but great men and women, have attempted to do.  Republicans as well as Democrats, they’ve tried before.  Everybody knows the story, starting with Teddy Roosevelt.  They’ve tried.  They were real bold leaders. 
But, Mr. President, they fell short.  You have turned, Mr. President, the right of every American to have access to decent health care into reality for the first time in American history. (Applause.)
Mr. President, I’ve gotten to know you well enough.  You want me to stop because I’m embarrassing you.  (Laughter.)  But I’m not going to stop for another minute, Mr. President, because you delivered on a promise -- a promise you made to all Americans when we moved into this building.
Mr. President, you are -- to repeat myself -- literally about to make history.  Our children and our grandchildren, they’re going to grow up knowing that a man named Barack Obama put the final girder in the framework for a social network in this country to provide the single most important element of what people need -- and that is access to good health -- (applause) -- and that every American from this day forward will be treated with simple fairness and basic justice.
Look, the classic poet, Virgil, once said that “The greatest wealth is health.”  The greatest wealth is health.  Well, today, America becomes a whole lot wealthier because tens of millions of Americans will be a whole lot healthier from this moment on.
Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States of America, Barack Obama.  (Applause.)
THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you, everybody.  Thank you.  Thank you everybody.  Thank you so much.  Thank you.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you, everybody.  Please, have a seat.
Thank you, Joe.  (Laughter.)
THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Good to be with you, Mr. President.  (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT:  Today, after almost a century of trying; today, after over a year of debate; today, after all the votes have been tallied –- health insurance reform becomes law in the United States of America.  (Applause.)  Today.
It is fitting that Congress passed this historic legislation this week.  For as we mark the turning of spring, we also mark a new season in America.  In a few moments, when I sign this bill, all of the overheated rhetoric over reform will finally confront the reality of reform.  (Applause.)
And while the Senate still has a last round of improvements to make on this historic legislation -- and these are improvements I’m confident they will make swiftly -- (applause)  -- the bill I’m signing will set in motion reforms that generations of Americans have fought for, and marched for, and hungered to see.
It will take four years to implement fully many of these reforms, because we need to implement them responsibly.  We need to get this right.  But a host of desperately needed reforms will take effect right away.  (Applause.)
This year, we’ll start offering tax credits to about 4 million small businessmen and women to help them cover the cost of insurance for their employees.  (Applause.)  That happens this year.
This year, tens of thousands of uninsured Americans with preexisting conditions, the parents of children who have a preexisting condition, will finally be able to purchase the coverage they need.  That happens this year.  (Applause.)
This year, insurance companies will no longer be able to drop people’s coverage when they get sick.  (Applause.)  They won’t be able to place lifetime limits or restrictive annual limits on the amount of care they can receive.  (Applause.)
This year, all new insurance plans will be required to offer free preventive care.  And this year, young adults will be able to stay on their parents’ policies until they’re 26 years old.  That happens this year.  (Applause.)
And this year, seniors who fall in the coverage gap known as the doughnut hole will start getting some help.  They’ll receive $250 to help pay for prescriptions, and that will, over time, fill in the doughnut hole.  And I want seniors to know, despite what some have said, these reforms will not cut your guaranteed benefits.  (Applause.)  In fact, under this law, Americans on Medicare will receive free preventive care without co-payments or deductibles.  That begins this year.  (Applause.)
Once this reform is implemented, health insurance exchanges will be created, a competitive marketplace where uninsured people and small businesses will finally be able to purchase affordable, quality insurance.  They will be able to be part of a big pool and get the same good deal that members of Congress get.  That’s what’s going to happen under this reform.  (Applause.)  And when this exchange is up and running, millions of people will get tax breaks to help them afford coverage, which represents the largest middle-class tax cut for health care in history.   That's what this reform is about.  (Applause.) 
This legislation will also lower costs for families and for businesses and for the federal government, reducing our deficit by over $1 trillion in the next two decades.  It is paid for.  It is fiscally responsible.  And it will help lift a decades-long drag on our economy.  That's part of what all of you together worked on and made happen.  (Applause.)
That our generation is able to succeed in passing this reform is a testament to the persistence –- and the character -– of the American people, who championed this cause; who mobilized; who organized; who believed that people who love this country can change it.
It’s also a testament to the historic leadership -– and uncommon courage –- of the men and women of the United States Congress, who’ve taken their lumps during this difficult debate. (Laughter.)
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Yes, we did.  (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT:  You know, there are few tougher jobs in politics or government than leading one of our legislative chambers.  In each chamber, there are men and women who come from different places and face different pressures, who reach different conclusions about the same things and feel deeply concerned about different things.
By necessity, leaders have to speak to those different concerns.  It isn’t always tidy; it is almost never easy.  But perhaps the greatest –- and most difficult –- challenge is to cobble together out of those differences the sense of common interest and common purpose that’s required to advance the dreams of all people -- especially in a country as large and diverse as ours.
And we are blessed by leaders in each chamber who not only do their jobs very well but who never lost sight of that larger mission.  They didn’t play for the short term; they didn’t play to the polls or to politics:  One of the best speakers the House of Representatives has ever had, Speaker Nancy Pelosi.  (Applause.)
AUDIENCE:  Nancy!  Nancy!  Nancy!  Nancy!
THE PRESIDENT:  One of the best majority leaders the Senate has ever had, Mr. Harry Reid.  (Applause.)
To all of the terrific committee chairs, all the members of Congress who did what was difficult, but did what was right, and passed health care reform -- not just this generation of Americans will thank you, but the next generation of Americans will thank you.
And of course, this victory was also made possible by the painstaking work of members of this administration, including our outstanding Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius -- (applause) -- and one of the unsung heroes of this effort, an extraordinary woman who led the reform effort from the White House, Nancy-Ann DeParle.  Where’s Nancy?  (Applause.)
Today, I’m signing this reform bill into law on behalf of my mother, who argued with insurance companies even as she battled cancer in her final days.
I’m signing it for Ryan Smith, who’s here today.  He runs a small business with five employees.  He’s trying to do the right thing, paying half the cost of coverage for his workers.  This bill will help him afford that coverage.
I’m signing it for 11-year-old Marcelas Owens, who’s also here.  (Applause.)  Marcelas lost his mom to an illness.  And she didn’t have insurance and couldn’t afford the care that she needed.  So in her memory he has told her story across America so that no other children have to go through what his family has experienced.  (Applause.)
I’m signing it for Natoma Canfield.  Natoma had to give up her health coverage after her rates were jacked up by more than 40 percent.  She was terrified that an illness would mean she’d lose the house that her parents built, so she gave up her insurance.  Now she’s lying in a hospital bed, as we speak, faced with just such an illness, praying that she can somehow afford to get well without insurance.  Natoma’s family is here today because Natoma can’t be.  And her sister Connie is here.  Connie, stand up.  (Applause.)
I’m signing this bill for all the leaders who took up this cause through the generations -- from Teddy Roosevelt to Franklin Roosevelt, from Harry Truman, to Lyndon Johnson, from Bill and Hillary Clinton, to one of the deans who’s been fighting this so long, John Dingell.  (Applause.)  To Senator Ted Kennedy.  (Applause.)  And it’s fitting that Ted’s widow, Vicki, is here -- it’s fitting that Teddy’s widow, Vicki, is here; and his niece Caroline; his son Patrick, whose vote helped make this reform a reality.  (Applause.)
I remember seeing Ted walk through that door in a summit in this room a year ago -- one of his last public appearances.  And it was hard for him to make it.  But he was confident that we would do the right thing.
Our presence here today is remarkable and improbable.  With all the punditry, all of the lobbying, all of the game-playing that passes for governing in Washington, it’s been easy at times to doubt our ability to do such a big thing, such a complicated thing; to wonder if there are limits to what we, as a people, can still achieve.  It’s easy to succumb to the sense of cynicism about what’s possible in this country.
But today, we are affirming that essential truth -– a truth every generation is called to rediscover for itself –- that we are not a nation that scales back its aspirations.  (Applause.)  We are not a nation that falls prey to doubt or mistrust.  We don't fall prey to fear.  We are not a nation that does what’s easy.  That’s not who we are.  That’s not how we got here.
We are a nation that faces its challenges and accepts its responsibilities.  We are a nation that does what is hard.  What is necessary.  What is right.  Here, in this country, we shape our own destiny.  That is what we do.  That is who we are.  That is what makes us the United States of America.
And we have now just enshrined, as soon as I sign this bill, the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care.  (Applause.)  And it is an extraordinary achievement that has happened because of all of you and all the advocates all across the country.
So, thank you.  Thank you.  God bless you, and may God bless the United States.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.
All right, I would now like to call up to stage some of the members of Congress who helped make this day possible, and some of the Americans who will benefit from these reforms.  And we’re going to sign this bill.
This is going to take a little while.  I’ve got to use every pen, so it’s going to take a really long time.  (Laughter.)  I didn’t practice.  (Laughter.)
(The bill is signed.)
We are done.  (Applause.)
END
11:56 A.M. EDT

Obama signs health bill into law | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

Obama signs health bill into law | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

Monday, March 22, 2010

Ann Coulter Threatened With Criminal Charges in Canada

Ann Coulter Threatened With Criminal Charges in Canada

this from FOX news. I normally would never use anything they write except when I try to show up how ignorant they are and totally insane. But this is too good to [pass up The Canadian Government University sent Coulter a letter stating that they have stricter freedom of speech laws then un the US, so she better shut her yap with all of her racist hatred fearmongering KKK dialogue. WOHOO I wish people here would get the guts to tell her the same thing HATS OFF TO CANADA!!

Canada is passing the US in terms of health care, civil rights, and all other issues. THey may be the dominant nation over the US pretty soon if the Fright WIng nutjobs in this country dont sit down and shut up.

Hawaii’s lawmakers in Congress praise historic health care bill | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

Hawaii’s lawmakers in Congress praise historic health care bill | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

LINGLE DOES NOT SPEAK FOR ME I AM HAPPY HEALTH CARE PASSED LINGLE SHOULD NOT MAKE PARTISAN STATEMENTS ON NATIONAL POLICY

Congress clears historic health care bill

Congress clears historic health care bill

My Congressman, Bart Stupak, Has Neither a Uterus Nor a Brain

My Congressman, Bart Stupak, Has Neither a Uterus Nor a Brain

GET CONGRESS OT OF MY UTERUS ONCE AND FOR ALL!!

Healthcare passed YAY

STUPAK AMMENDMENT SUCKS

BOO

Friday, March 19, 2010

Kenyan Birth Certificate Generator - Make your own! Invalidating legitimate presidencies since 2009!


Sarah Palins REAL birth Certificate!!Kenyan Birth Certificate Generator - Make your own! Invalidating legitimate presidencies since 2009!

Nuns Break From Bishops and Urge Passage of Health Care Reform

Nuns Break From Bishops and Urge Passage of Health Care Reform

THANK GOD THERE IS SOME SANITY IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH< AS NUNS ACROSS THE NATUION URGE THE PASSING OF HEALTHCARE EVEN AS THE POPE AND THE MALES IN THE CHURCH OPPOSE IT WATCH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SPLIT INTO TWO< AND ALSO WATCH ALL CHRISTIAN RELIGIOS NOW START TO BREAK APART AS THOSE THAT FOUGHT HEALTHCARE FOR THERI FELLOW MAN ARE ABANDONED BY THOSE WHO CHOSE HUMANITY OVER INSANITY

GOP: Voting On Health Care Reform is an Affront to GOD!!!11!

GOP: Voting On Health Care Reform is an Affront to GOD!!!11!


OMG give me a break. Its BRILLIANT to hold the vote on a Sunday. EVERYONE knows the Sabbath is Saturday. LOL


The only poeple that wont be voting their conscience? Lets see. Will it be the hypocritical right wing crustian, (no its not a typo) nutwingers from the party of no, who claim this is a CHRISTIAN country and we dont do the poeples business on a Sunday? HAHAHAHAHA.

Lets hope so. Then their constituents can stick it to em for staying home on a Sunday. If they DO vote, then they can can reamed for voting on a Sunday. ITS BRILLIANT LOL

Conservative Reporter Shocked By The Lunacy of Teabagger Event

Conservative Reporter Shocked By The Lunacy of Teabagger Event

more defecting every minute

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Hawaii's homeless law fuels tension - The Boston Globe

Hawaii's homeless law fuels tension - The Boston Globe

This article was written in 2004, citing a growing trend for four years, which takes the date back to 2000, when the homeless crisis first started to peak. Today it is worse then ever, with homeless people literally terrified of going into the shelter system, because they are afraid of the rules, which can be extremely arbitrary. The prison like conditions, extremely strict rules in particular in regards to childrens behavior, and intimidation is really what is keeping people out of shelter. other fears are losing jobs because of lack of childcare, due to new cuts in childcare subsidies which are slowly dwindling down to nothing leaving working homeless without options for childcare. Unless shelters offer full childcare at all hours of the day, since many parents work at night due to tourism industry jobs which are frequently in the evening and at night, they lose what jobs they have. This will of course cause their credit ratings to go down, which will then keep them out of public housing if new rules and regulations are. This couples with planned DHS office closures are an absolute nightmare scenario. We have done nothing but slide backwards in this state with our housing situation. These are people who are used to having land and room, but it has been ripped away from them and their families, jobs have not kept pace with the living expenses and rates are still too high, and housing is still too scarce.

PLEASE ATTEND THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING ON FRIDAY MARCH 19 STARTING AT 5 PM at the KCC Cafeteria, press conference before the hearing please come. ALOHA

Homeless in paradise 2003 article that could have been ripped from todays front pages.

Homeless in paradise

This was one of the most excellent coverage the Honolulu Advertiser ever did of this situation.

In 7 years we are right back where we started from. There have been incidents of reported "lock downs" in shelters of mothers with small children, where one woman claimed sh was told she couldnt leave the shelter for 30 days. She claimed her three small children were constantly getting "write ups".

For Hawaiis children and families we have always been free to be on the beach. It was always where you went if you were homeless. Now, the beach, fresh air, clean sunshine, and an ocean and sand to play in its difficult to lock children into facilities where their behavior is monitored and scrutinized every second of the day and parents are punished for supposed infractions of their childrens naturally exhuberant behavior.

Are prison camp internment camp style facilities the answer to Hawaiis homeless program? Are using shelter rules and regulations to control the behavior of hawaiis homeless as if they were criminals or second class citizens the way to intimidate people into facilities where they have no choice but to opbey any rule that is put to them even if it may be a violation of their basic civil liberties and human rights? Now, HPHA states that unless you are in a homeless shelter, you will now go to the bottom of the list for public housing. Laws are being created that essentially will give the law the right to take away what meager belongings people posess, take away their right to fresh air, sunshine and freedom and lock them up in little more than prison conditions. Even if they do this, there is still no guarantee of housing. At the same time, HPHA is looking to entice people with higher incomes into public housing by offering them incentives, and requiring credit checks. How many homeless have good credit? My guess is about one percent. With bad credit you can be turned away from public housing. SO where then will these people go? Nowhere. back into the street. shelters have a limit as to how long you can stay there. so does transitional housing. Then what? You cannot break the cycle this way. THis is no way to solve the homeless problem, but it is the way to destroy both emotionally phsychologicvally and materially the last vestiges of any dignity these poeple have. And that is fundamentally wrong.

Honolulu to restrict tents in parks to keep out homeless campers | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

Honolulu to restrict tents in parks to keep out homeless campers | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

THINK THIS IS INHUMANE? WHAT ARE THE RULES OF SHELTERS? WHAT IS KEEPING PEoPLE AWAY FROM THEM? TOO STRICT RULES ESPECIALLY WITH CHILDCARE> PERHAPS A LACK OF FRESH AIR? PRISON LIKE CONDITION AND LACK OF FREEDOM TO MOVE AROUND? TOO CLOSE QUARTERS? LACK OF PRIVACY? FEARS OF CPS INVOLVEMENT? WHAT IS KEEPING PEOPLE OUT OF SHELTERS? FORCING THEM INTO SHELTERS REMINDS ME OF INTERNMENT CAMPS> IS THAT WHAT SHELTERS WILL BECOME? WILL PE0PLE BE GETTING HOUSING? FROM WHERE< AND HOW? IF PUBLIC HOUSING REQUIRES CREDIT CHECKS< AND THESE PEoPLE DONT QUALIFY THEN WHERE WILL THEY GO? WHAT ARE THE LIMITS FOR SHELTERS? THESE QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ANSWERED!!!

Meeting on DHS, housing set for Friday at KCC

Meeting on DHS, housing set for Friday at KCC

IT IS URGENT THAT EVERYONE ATTEND THIS MEETING!!

IT IS TIME FOR THE PEOPLE TO STAND UP...PLEASE STOP THE WAR ON THE POOR!!!!!


I worked with Representative Mizuno, and all of the rest of them to bring this meeting to Kauai. PLEASE attend. NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON was at the Public Housing Hearing accxept for me. People DID NOT know about the meeting. Now is yur chance. IF you come to this meeting, tht proves that the HPHA did not try hard enough to get people to attend. FURTHER, Kauai had NO REPRESENTATION at this proposal formation. NONE. Thus none of our concerns were adressed. DO you want to have credit checks, faster evictions if you are late and people who can afford the market rate living in the nicer sections of public housing and receiving special incentives to live there such as cable tv telephone service and electrical hookups paid for by HPHA rather than using that money to pay for a service such as a representative payee program, which would be voluntary, take charge of your finances, pay your bills and cut you a weekly spending check so thqt you would never be late for your rent again? Or how about the ability to use ELECTRONIC PAYMENT to pay your bill instead of having to physically WALK INTO A BANK BILL IN HAND to pay your resnt? We all know this would SOLVE the rent collection issue.

BUT INSTEAD HOUSING WANTS TO EVICT YOU< SHOVE YOU ONTO THE STREET< MAKE YOU H)OMELESS< AND THEN YOU WOULD HAVE NO OPTIONS BECAUSE YOU WOULD BE BANNED FROM HOUSING!! Do you want a paperpusher being responsible for getting you food stams, quest medical and financial help on time, and in a humane and equitable manner? Or do you prefer a licenced SOCIAL WORKER who actually cares about you and your family and services there to help you? Are you interested in having Macdonalds style one stop drive through services under a privatized agreement which will fire all of your workers, then rehire them for half the wages, and they will be grossly overqualified for jobs that will no longer require a degree or even experience? Just the ability to operate a computer system and push paper? A HEARTLESS cold system which will care nothing for you and intimidate you into NOT seeking help, and making access limited?

NO? WELL SHOW UP TO THE MEETING THEN!!

Anne Punohu-Relentless 3/17/10 at OneTrueMedia.com

Saturday, March 13, 2010

U.N. must stand up for rights of Iranians - CNN.com

U.N. must stand up for rights of Iranians - CNN.com

EXACTLY RIGHT

Is abortion your moral bottom line on health reform? - Faith & Reason

Is abortion your moral bottom line on health reform? - Faith & Reason



By Carlos Osorio, AP


The conflict over the Catholic church's influence in U.S. health care reform is intense: Will the church's efforts to shut off all access to insurance coverage for abortion, even if people want to pay for it themselves, trump its strong desire to offer more care and better care for the poor and working Americans?

The abortion issue puts it all on the table for Catholic health programs, the leading non-governmental care providers in the USA. Running the table is Richard Doerflinger, lobbyist for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

NPR's Laura Parker's profile of him says,

He and John Carr, who also works for the bishops... helped craft the final wording of the anti-abortion amendment offered by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., that cleared the way for House passage of the health care bill by five votes.

"He's a real smart guy," says Stupak, referring to Doerflinger. "Pretty detailed guy who does his homework ."

Now Stupak is back with an effort to cut off access to individuals to purchase insurance for abortion services, even if they pay for it themselves.

The Christian Science Monitor, looking at the abortion issue, points out:

In sum, when it comes to coverage for abortions, in the House version you'd need two different policies. In the Senate version you'd just need to write two checks and anti-abortion House members think that's getting awfully close to federal funding for the procedure. (Monitor report: House Democrats scramble to find a majority to vote for the Senate's healthcare bill.)

The Senate bill language "basically says that your federal tax subsidies can be used to pay for abortion coverage," said Rep. Stupak in a March 4 interview on National Public Radio (NPR).

Laura Parker goes on to say,...

...critics say it would be a colossal mistake to kill universal health care for an incremental victory on abortion. "The difference between the two bills is pretty thin," says Michael Sean Winters, a liberal Catholic author. "Doerflinger is so dug in, he's missing the point on the Senate bill, which is also pro-life."

Not to Doerflinger. His bottom line, he tells Parker:

If the bill attacks life itself, in our view, it's not health care reform.

Other people have different "bottom lines." What's yours? Do you see a provision in the proposals that you think is essential to see passed or defeated because of your faith or ethical point of view?

'Is God dying?' Questions on morality, evolution and the mind - Faith & Reason

'Is God dying?' Questions on morality, evolution and the mind - Faith & Reason

Science Magazine


Are we evolving away from belief in God? Why did thousands of intelligent people let themselves be deceived by investment fraud king Bernie Madoff? Is morality really in decline in the West and can it be reconstructed?

Such questions are in the air at a seminar on science, morality and the mind at Cambridge University, this weekend sponsored by the Templeton Foundation. I've participated in the Templeton-Cambridge Fellowships in Science & Religion since 2005. And for the next few days, I'd like to bring you along for a taste of the lectures and discussions.

By Dr Jose Liht, NONE
It all starts with questions. Fraser Watts, a professor of theology and science, and Director of Studies, Queens' College set the program off with a wave of his own: What can science tell us about the origin and workings of morality? How did moral capacity arise? Is it all evolutionary? What's the role of neuroscience? What goes on in the brain when we're making moral judgments? Can we use this knowledge to reconstruct morality?

Michael Reiss, Professor of Science at the Institute of Education University of London, a specialist in evolutionary biology (and an ordained Anglican priest) walked us through the history of theories on altruism as an evolutionary phenomenon (like vampire bats who support each other by offering up blood if a mate didn't succeed in his own hunting) and the advantages of being good at deception (think Bernie Madoff).


By Martin Redfern
Even so, just knowing something has an evolutionary origin "tells you nothing about whether it is valid or useful," Reiss says.

So understanding how the mind can evolve to do mathematics is separate from deciding if a particular theorem is good. Translated to evolution, biology and society, it means it might have been safer in some times and societies if you thought there were gods. "But that doesn't answer the question of whether there actually are Gods."

"Is God actually dying?" mused Barbara Bradley Hagerty of National Public Radio.

"I'm not a prophet," quipped Reiss. "I have absolutely no idea." Still, he observed, human conceptions of the divine are very different today than in the past, different often than their own parents, and that it would not be surprising if they continued to change.

Whose idea of God is the definitive one, the one that can be said to be living, dying or changing?Where do you think God came from and if our idea of God vanishes, does God?

Obama's education law overhaul to focus on college

 


Honoluluadvertiser - Obama's education law overhaul to focus on college

Obama's education law overhaul to focus on college
Posted 3/13/2010 1:22 PM ET E-mail | Save | Print
 President Barack Obama walks out of the Jane E. Lawton Community  Recreation Center in Chevy Chase, Md., Saturday, March 13, 2010, after  ha Obama and the first lady attended their daughter Sasha's basketball  game. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
by Pablo Martinez Monsivais, AP
President Barack Obama walks out of the Jane E. Lawton Community Recreation Center in Chevy Chase, Md., Saturday, March 13, 2010, after ha Obama and the first lady attended their daughter Sasha's basketball game. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

ATLANTA — The Obama administration unveiled its plan Saturday to radically change his predecessor's No Child Left Behind law in hopes of replacing an accountability system that in the last decade has tagged more than a third of schools as failing and created a hodgepodge of sometimes weak academic standards among states.
The changes would dismantle the 2002 law championed by President George W. Bush, moving away from punishing schools that don't meet benchmarks and instead focusing on rewarding schools for progress, particularly with poor and minority students. The blueprint calls for states to adopt standards that ensure students are ready for college or a career rather than grade-level proficiency -- the focus of the current law.
"Unless we take action -- unless we step up -- there are countless children who will never realize their full talent and potential," Obama said during a video address on Saturday. "I don't accept that future for them. And I don't accept that future for the United States of America."
The blueprint also would allow states to use subjects other than reading and mathematics as part of their measurements for meeting federal goals, pleasing many education groups that have said No Child Left Behind encouraged teachers not to focus on history, art, science, social studies and other important subjects.
And, for the first time in the law's 45-year history, the White House is proposing a $4 billion increase in federal education spending, most of which would go to increase the competition among states for grant money and move away from formula-based funding.
The blueprint goes before the House Education and Labor Committee on Wednesday as Obama pushes Congress to reauthorize the education law this year, a time-consuming task that some observers say will be difficult. Committee Chairman George Miller, a Democrat from California, praised Obama's plan.
"This blueprint lays the right markers to help us reset the bar for our students and the nation," Miller said in a prepared statement.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan briefed a handful of governors, lawmakers and education groups on the plan Friday, including Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue, a Republican.
"The governor is very supportive of the direction the secretary is going," said Perdue's spokesman Chris Schrimpf.
A few other highlights from the blueprint:
_ By 2020, all students graduating from high school would need to be ready for college or a career. That's a shift away from the current law, which calls for all students to be performing at grade level in reading and math by 2014.
_ Give more rewards -- money and flexibility -- to high-poverty schools that are seeing big gains in student achievement and use them as a model for other schools in low-income neighborhoods that struggle with performance.
_ Punish the lowest-performing 5 percent of schools using aggressive measures, such as having the state take over federal funding for poor students, replacing the principal and half the teaching staff or closing the school altogether.
_ Duncan has said the name No Child Left Behind will be dropped because it is associated with a harsh law that punishes schools for not reaching benchmarks even if they've made big gains. He said the administration will work with Congress to come up with a new name.
Amy Wilkins, a vice president with The Education Trust in Washington, D.C., called the blueprint a "culture shift."
"One of the things America has not been clear about is what k-12 is supposed to do," Wilkins said. "In this, we're saying K-12 is supposed to prepare kids for college and meaningful careers."
The nation's first federal education law -- Elementary and Secondary Education Act -- was passed in 1965 as part of Lyndon B. Johnson's war on poverty. The law has been reauthorized several times since, most recently in 2001 under President George W. Bush.
It was criticized by educators for focusing too much on testing and not enough on learning. Daniel Domenech, executive director of the American Association of School Administrators, said he is glad to see No Child Left Behind go away.
"We're delighted over that," he said. "We have not been a fan of No Child Left Behind."
___
Associated Press Writer Christine Armario in Miami contributed to this report.

DON’T FENCE ME IN

DON’T FENCE ME IN

A Post from Andy Parx blog about the dispute at Larsons beach.

WHen I read it, I was wondering just exactly Bruce was talking about when he said he would have 50 Hawaiians down there, and that he was reclaiming the land for the Hawaiians. In that case, me and my kids, both Hawaiians, will be down there real soon to go get a peice of land then. I was unaware thats what was going on down there. Awesome! Now we can get out of Public Housing, and have a nice little house, and a peice of land, and I can grow plants, and fruits, and veggies, and flowers to make leis. I hope thats true! So you beleive its true? If it is, hey Bruce....call me. Dying to get a peice of that land.

Honoluluadvertiser - US avoids anti-abortion debate at UN meeting

Honoluluadvertiser - US avoids anti-abortion debate at UN meeting

US avoids anti-abortion debate at UN meeting
Posted 3/13/2010 12:58 PM ET E-mail | Save | Print
 U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton addresses a  meeting in honor of the 15th Anniversary of the UN World Conference on  Women in Beijing at the United Nations headquarters on Friday, March 12,  2010. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)
by Mary Altaffer, AP
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton addresses a meeting in honor of the 15th Anniversary of the UN World Conference on Women in Beijing at the United Nations headquarters on Friday, March 12, 2010. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)
UNITED NATIONS — A U.N. meeting to assess progress in advancing the fight for women's equality that ended Friday had a dramatically different slant than a similar session held five years ago: This time, the United States was not trying to make an anti-abortion declaration a crucial theme.

Much of the 2005 meeting to take stock of what countries had done to implement the landmark platform of action adopted at the 1995 U.N. women's conference in Beijing was consumed by the Bush administration's demand that the final declaration make clear that women are not guaranteed a right to abortion.

By contrast, abortion was a non-issue during the two-week session that concluded Friday with a rousing speech by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who had electrified the 1995 Beijing conference when she was first lady.

Her focus was on galvanizing fresh momentum to promote equal opportunities for women in business and education, to end discrimination under law and in practical reality, and to stop the "global pandemic" of violent attacks on women. She made a single reference to the U.S. increasing support for family planning as part of its Global Health Initiative, which also aims to reduce maternal and child deaths and HIV infections.

At the 2005 review conference, the Bush administration fought to insert language against abortion in the final declaration. But the U.S. faced strong international opposition and near the end of that meeting it backed down and dropped the demand.

In sharp contrast, the final declaration for the 2010 review was adopted with little fanfare during last week's ministerial session. It reaffirmed the Beijing platform, welcomed progress toward implementing it, and pledged more action to overcome the "challenges and obstacles" to achieve gender equality and the empowerment of women.

Charlotte Bunch, the founding director of Rutgers University's Center for Women's Global Leadership who attended Beijing and both follow-up meetings, said the biggest difference "is the change in the U.S. government."

The Bush administration questioned the reaffirmation of the Beijing platform because of reproductive rights and the abortion issue, which were "hot issues," she said. But the Obama administration strongly backs the platform, as Clinton stressed Friday.

The Beijing platform calls for governments to end discrimination against women and close the gender gap in critical areas including health, education, employment, political participation and human rights.

At the 1994 U.N. population conference in Cairo, delegates approved a platform recognizing that abortion is a fact that governments must deal with as a public health issue. At Beijing the following year, delegates reaffirmed this and went further, asking governments to review laws that punish women for having abortions.

But attempts to approve stronger language on access to abortions failed at Beijing, and references to sexual rights and sexual orientation were dropped. Nonetheless, the Beijing platform stated for the first time that women have the right to "decide freely and responsibly on matters related to their sexuality ... free of coercion, discrimination and violence."

Adrienne Germain, president of the International Women's Health Coalition who also attended all three meetings, welcomed the "robust references" to the Cairo and Beijing conferences in resolutions adopted Friday by the Commission on the Status of Women.

She cited important measures on ending female circumcision, combating HIV and AIDS especially in women, and reducing maternal mortality, which has remained high and virtually unchanged since 1995.

Germain praised President Barack Obama and Clinton for understanding that it is impossible to improve women's health without a broader commitment to human rights and equality.

Bunch, now a senior scholar at the Rutgers center, welcomed the commission's adoption of another resolution Friday, introduced by Egypt, endorsing the creation of a single U.N. body to promote the advancement of women, to be headed by an undersecretary-general.

While reproduction health wasn't an issue at this conference, Patricia Licuanan, a former head of the Commission on the Status of Women who chaired the committee responsible for drafting the Beijing platform, said "I don't think it's less of an issue ... because ... the church, religious fundamentalism, is on the upsurge."

"I think it's still very much around," said Licuanan, who is president of Miriam College in Manila, in the Philippines. "That's part of the fear of any type of movement to open up discussions on Beijing. I really would fear that possibly (the platform) might (go) backward."

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Hawaii Gov. Lingle speaks against new taxes, 1st Ld-Writethru, HI

Hawaii Gov. Lingle speaks against new taxes, 1st Ld-Writethru, HI

HAHAHAHAHAHA. The only person making life a living hell for the people of Kauai is THE GOVERNOR

Kaua‘i school funds to be used for O‘ahu special election

Kaua‘i school funds to be used for O‘ahu special election

wow what a slimey thing to do linkges boy dukie baby is running against neil for governor. he left early to concentrate on the campaign. so there needs to be a special election, there is supposed to be money in the election fund to cover this, or in the rainy say fund. but lingle siphoned off this money a long time ago so what does she do now? change the accounting ruiles so that any fund can be raided now, so she raids public school funding OF COURSE...from where? THE OUTER ISLANDS her private little trough that the dictator can siphon off any time she chooses. whats more she knows a lot of support from neil comes from the outer islands. so to enrage the citizenry against neil whom she sees as the biggest threat to the dukie she, the heartless queen of no heart she raids already strapped schoiol funding from all of the outer islands to pay for it knowing full well that some people will not know the truth. But most will. We arent stupid lingle. I know you see the unwashed masses as not good enough to exist and to be used at your beck and call whenever you want but not this time. Its time to impeach you. period. Lets the games begin Neil will get a ton more votes now because poeple will know the truth. We are gonna make sure they know.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

HPHA Agenda 02.18.10 Amended.pdf (application/pdf Object)

HPHA Agenda 02.18.10 Amended.pdf (application/pdf Object)

WHAT ARE THE REPORTS FROM THIS MEETING WE ALL WANT TO KNOW A FED IRDWER TO GET STUFF DONE!! WHAT IS IT? WE WANT TO KNOW!! PUT ALL REPORTS ONLINE MR TANIGUCHI

1 Elig_Selection_Admission_Policy.pdf (application/pdf Object)

1 Elig_Selection_Admission_Policy.pdf (application/pdf Object)

DISCRIMINATORY !! READ THE INCENTIVES FOR HIGHER INCOME LEVELS

NICE LANDSCAPING CLEAN ENVIRONEMNT AND OH YEAH GUESS WHAT"""

THEY WILL PAY FOR YOUR CABLE TELEVISION< YOUR PH(ONE AND PAY FOR YOUR ELECTRIC HOOK UPS TOO

GUESS WHAT POOR GUS HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIRS< LIVE IN TERMITE EATEN BUILDINGS AND FIGHT RAT INVESTATIONS!!

CALL FOR TANIGUCHIS IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION

Punohu's Politics, Environment and Culture Blog: Notice of Public Hearing 2010 PHA Plan.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Punohu's Politics, Environment and Culture Blog: Notice of Public Hearing 2010 PHA Plan.pdf (application/pdf Object)

TELL TANIGUCHI TO TAKE HIS PLAN AND PUT IT UNDER A ROCK!! READ THE PLAN FOR YOU*RSELF!! GET TO THE MEETING HERE IN KAPAA ON THE 15th at FIVE PM

Notice of Public Hearing 2010 PHA Plan.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Notice of Public Hearing 2010 PHA Plan.pdf (application/pdf Object)

MEETING ON THE 15th IN KAPAA PLEASE SHOW UP!! THIS IS VITALLY IMPIORTANT!! NEW RULES UNFAIR AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS SYSTEMATICALLY TEARING APART OUR HOUSING< AND PUTTING POEPLE ON THE STREET!! GET TO THIS MEETING NO MATTER WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO

1 in 6 in Hawaii lacking full-time work | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

1 in 6 in Hawaii lacking full-time work | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

THIS IS WHAT LINGLE HAS BROUGHT US UNEMPLYMENT AND THE NEED TO RAISE TAXES WAY TO GO LINGLE!!

The Associated Press: Hawaii jobless rate inches upward, led by tourism

The Associated Press: Hawaii jobless rate inches upward, led by tourism


Just SICK of all of these lies and deceptions by the Lingle administration. A sshe cuts backl on social services and school fundings she causes working class poeple to no longer afford to be able to go to worik, with lack of childcare, childare funding slashed by more than 75 percent, new proposed rules and regulations for housing through the fuve year plan and restructuring of DHS, she has sungle handedly DESTROYED THE LABOR FORCE IN THIS STATE.


so lingle, dont cry when the tourists have NO ONE TO GREET THEM WHEN THEY COME HERE.

tell them cook their own meals, make their own beds cut their own lawns fly their own helicoptors drive their own busses and nurse themselves back to health !!!!!!!!!


STOP LETTING LINGLE PUT THE SCREWS TO HER!! TRUN THAT AROUND TODAY! IMEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH

Budget cuts may be amplifying recession in Hawaii | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

Budget cuts may be amplifying recession in Hawaii | honoluluadvertiser.com | The Honolulu Advertiser

IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH DEPORT TO CALIFORNIA DEPORT TO CALIFORNIA DEPORT TO CALIFORNIA IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH DEPORT TO CALIFORNIA DEPORT TO CALIFORNIA

2010 Census touted: Millions of federal dollars are at stake

2010 Census touted: Millions of federal dollars are at stake

THe census may be the real reason we have a budget shortfall in this state. Without an adequate count we have been losing our share for years. In fact, if we actually had an adequate count, we could have more representation in the Senate and the house, and even in congress thus giving Hawaii MORE delegates, and a larger voice in the way government is operated and give more opportunities to people for running for public office.

Further when we do planning, its imperative that we have accurate numbers especially for things such as dumps, where counting those who are in public housing will prevent dumps from being built in areas with high poverty, part of the Environmental Justice Law.

Nor only that, Kauai can get more for social services, highways, and parks and recreation. By not helping poeple to understand what the census is and what it is for everyone does a disservice to their neighborhoods, their communities, their families and the state and the country. If you really care about yourself your family and your community you will fill out the census. Dont wait for someone to come knocking at your door to remind you not to be an ostrich with your head stuck in the sand. IT doesnt take that long to figure out.

And for you fiscally conservative types, when you fill out the form and send it in and poeple dont have to come knocking at your door, you actually save the taxpayers money. SO get a grip, grip a pen, and sign in to the 2010 census.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

WATCH CALIFORNIA CUTS DESTROYING THE POOR COME TO OUR MEETING MARCH 19 5-7 30 pm at KCC Cafeteria



A Legislative informational meeting from March 19th 5-7 30 pm at KCC cafeteria in regards to reorganizations of DHS and Public housing. You need to come to this meeting. these organizations will severely effect thousand oif poeple across our state, but will particularly harsh for Kauais people

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Op-Ed Columnist - The Great Tea Party Rip-Off - NYTimes.com

Op-Ed Columnist - The Great Tea Party Rip-Off - NYTimes.com

The New York Times
January 17, 2010



Well here we go one of the BEst articles written to date on the cashing in of lackey Steele stealing from the Repubs and bleeding the beast. Probably getting back for all those whip lashiungs his forefathers took on behalf of racists whitesa. good for him take their money, and scare the crap utta them. you may be a lackey but your a smart one you will walk a way rich and laffing at tall those repub and tea [arty bigots. in a few years time you will come out with a scathing expose on what it took to buy you to front for them it will be awesome.



Published: January 16, 2010

Even given the low bar set by America’s bogus conversations about race, the short-lived Harry Reid fracas was a most peculiar nonevent. For all the hyperventilation in cable news land, this supposed racial brawl didn’t seem to generate any controversy whatsoever in what is known as the real world.
Skip to next paragraph

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
Frank Rich

Related

Times Topics: Michael Steele | Sarah Palin


Readers' Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Eugene Robinson, the liberal black columnist at The Washington Post, wrote that he was “neither shocked nor outraged” at Reid’s less-than-articulate observation that Barack Obama benefited politically from being “light-skinned” and for lacking a “Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one.” Besides, Robinson said, Reid’s point was “surely true.” The black conservative Ward Connerly agreed, writing in The Wall Street Journal that he was “having a difficult time determining what it was that Mr. Reid said that was so offensive.”
President Obama immediately granted Reid absolution. A black columnist at The Daily News in New York, Stanley Crouch, even stood up for the archaic usage of “Negro.” George Will defended Reid from charges of racism as vociferously as Democrats did. Al Sharpton may have accepted Reid’s apology, but for once there’s no evidence that he ever cared enough to ask for one. So who, actually, was the aggrieved party here? What — or who — was really behind this manufactured race war with no victims?
It would be easy to dismiss the entire event as a credulous news media’s collaboration with a publisher’s hype for a new tell-all-gossip 2008 campaign book, “Game Change,” which breathlessly broke the Reid “bombshell.” But this is a more interesting tale than that. The true prime mover in this story was not a book publicist but Michael Steele, the chairman of the Republican Party and by far the loudest and most prominent Beltway figure demanding that Reid resign as Senate majority leader as punishment for his “racism.”
Steele is widely regarded as a clown by observers of all political persuasions, but he is clownish like a fox. His actions in this incident offer some hilarious and instructive insights into what’s going on in the Republican hierarchy right now as it tries to cope not just with our first African-American president but with a restive base embracing right-wing tea-party populism that loathes the establishment in both parties. And though Steele is black, and perhaps the most enthusiastic player of the race card in American politics today, race was a red herring in his Reid vendetta. It threw most everyone off the scent of his real motivation, which had nothing to do with black versus white but everything to do with green, as in money.
A profligate spender, Steele had inaugurated his arrival as party chairman by devoting nearly $20,000 to redecorate his office because he found it “way too male” for his sensitive tastes. In the weeks just before “Game Change” emerged, Steele was in more hot water. Over the holidays, G.O.P. elders were shocked to learn that their front man had a side career as a motivational public speaker at up to $20,000 a gig. The party treasury, which contained $22.8 million upon Steele’s arrival at the end of January 2009, was down to $8.7 million by late November, with 2010 campaign expenditures rapidly arriving. “He needs to raise money for the party, not his wallet,” one Republican leader griped to Politico.
Then, just after New Year, Steele published an unexpected book of his own, “Right Now: A 12-Step Program for Defeating the Obama Agenda.” He hadn’t told his employers that the book was in the works, and, to add further insult, he attacks unnamed party leaders in its pages for forsaking conservative principles. Since it hit the stores, Steele has pursued a book tour for fun and personal profit, all the while daring his G.O.P. critics to bring it on. “If you don’t want me in the job, fire me,” he taunted them. “But until then, shut up. Get with the program, or get out of the way.”
Fire him? Steele knows better than anyone that his party can’t afford what Clarence Thomas might call a “high-tech lynching” of the only visible black guy it has in even a second-tier office. Steele has said that white Republicans are “scared” of him. They are. He loves to play head games with their racial paranoia and insecurities, whether he’s publicly professing “slum love” for the Indian-American Louisiana governor, Bobby Jindal, or starting a blog on the R.N.C. site titled “What Up?,” or announcing that he would use “fried chicken and potato salad” to recruit minority voters. As long as the G.O.P. remains largely a whites-only country club, Steele has job security. But he had real reason to fear some new restraints on the cash box; last year the party was driven to write a rule requiring him to get approval for expenditures over $100,000.
On Jan. 9 The Washington Post ran a front-page article headlined “Frustrations With Steele Leaving G.O.P. in a Bind,” reporting, among other embarrassments, that the party had spent $90 million during Steele’s brief reign while raising just $84 million. Enter “Game Change,” right in the nick of time for Steele to pull off his own cunning game change. On Jan. 10 he stormed “Fox News Sunday” and “Meet the Press” to demand Reid’s head. There has been hardly a mention of Steele’s sins since. He can laugh all the way to the bank.
His behavior is not anomalous. Steele is representative of a fascinating but little noted development on the right: the rise of buckrakers who are exploiting the party’s anarchic confusion and divisions to cash in for their own private gain. In this cause, Steele is emulating no one if not Sarah Palin, whose hunger for celebrity and money outstrips even his own. As many suspected at the time, her 2008 campaign wardrobe, like the doomed campaign itself, was just a preview of coming attractions: she would surely dump the bother of serving as Alaska’s besieged governor for a lucrative star turn on Fox News. Last week she made it official.
Both Steele and Palin claim to be devotees of the tea party movement. “I’m a tea partier, I’m a town-haller, I’m a grass-roots-er” is how Steele put it in a recent radio interview, wet-kissing a market he hopes will buy his book. Palin has far more grandiose ambitions. She recently signed on as a speaker for the first Tea Party Convention, scheduled next month in Nashville — even though she had turned down a speaking invitation from the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, the traditional meet-and-greet for the right. The conservative conference doesn’t pay. The Tea Party Convention does. A blogger at Nashville Scene reported that Palin’s price for the event was $120,000.
The entire Tea Party Convention is a profit-seeking affair charging $560 a ticket — plus the cost of a room at the Opryland Hotel. Among the convention’s eight listed sponsors is Tea Party Emporium, which gives as its contact address 444 Madison Avenue in New York, also home to the high-fashion brand Burberry. This emporium’s Web site offers a bejeweled tea bag at $89.99 for those furious at “a government hell bent on the largest redistribution of wealth in history.” This is almost as shameless as Glenn Beck, whose own tea party profiteering has included hawking gold coins merchandised by a sponsor of his radio show.
Last week a prominent right-wing blogger, Erick Erickson of RedState.com, finally figured out that the Tea Party Convention “smells scammy,” likening it to one of those Nigerian e-mails promising untold millions. Such rumbling about the movement’s being co-opted by hucksters may explain why Palin used her first paid appearance at Fox last Tuesday to tell Bill O’Reilly that she would recycle her own tea party profits in political contributions. But Erickson had it right: the tea party movement is being exploited — and not just by marketers, lobbyists, political consultants and corporate interests but by the Republican Party, as exemplified by Palin and Steele, its most prominent leaders.
Tea partiers hate the G.O.P. establishment and its Wall Street allies, starting with the Bushies who created TARP, almost as much as they do Obama and his Wall Street pals. When Steele and Palin pay lip service to the movement, they are happy to glom on to its anti-tax, anti-Obama, anti-government, anti-big-bank vitriol. But they don’t call for any actual action against the bailed-out perpetrators of the financial crisis. They’d never ask for investments to put ordinary Americans back to work. They have no policies to forestall foreclosures or protect health insurance for the tea partiers who’ve been shafted by hard times. Their only economic principle beside tax cuts is vilification of the stimulus that did save countless jobs for firefighters, police officers and teachers at the state and local level.
The Democrats’ efforts to counter the deprivation and bitterness spawned by the Great Recession are indeed timid and imperfect. The right has a point when it says that the Senate health care votes of Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana were bought with pork. But at least their constituents can share the pigout. Hustlers like Steele and Palin take the money and run. All their followers get in exchange is a lousy tea party T-shirt. Or a ghost-written self-promotional book. Or a tepid racial sideshow far beneath the incendiary standards of the party whose history from Strom to “macaca” has driven away nearly every black American except Steele for the past 40 years.